This is what your scan looks like.
We asked each of five AI tools the questions this business's customers ask, many times over, and counted how many named it. Every number below ships with its range, not a single point-in-time guess.
Visibility by platform
Rate, range across passes, and the count of answers that named this business, for each of the five platforms. Never blended into one score, because a blended average would hide the platform where this business is at zero.
| Platform | Named in | Rate | Status | Range across passes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perplexity | 23 of 45 | 51% | Good | 44 to 58% |
| Google AI Overviews | 6 of 45 | 13% | Poor | 8 to 18% |
| ChatGPT | 5 of 45 | 11% | Poor | 6 to 16% |
| Gemini | 3 of 45 | 7% | Poor | 3 to 11% |
| Claude | 0 of 45 | 0% | Critical | 0% |
What you see first
This business is absent from Claude entirely, and ChatGPT only names it on the questions its website has pages for. The rate and the rank are where a scan starts. The findings and head to head comparisons below are the layer subscribers get on top: the why, and exactly what to change.
Example findings
What subscribers see: specific, from the business's own results, tied to the exact answers behind them.
ChatGPT reads Yelp and Healthgrades for dentist questions in your city. The two practices it names most appear on both. You appear on neither.
You are missing from all 6 emergency questions. Every business named on them shows 24 hour service on its website. Yours does not mention hours.
Perplexity cited your competitor's reviews 31 times and yours once. Their review page is public and indexed. Yours sits behind a login.
Head to head in the market
One platform at a time, never blended: who Perplexity names for the same dentist questions, counted exactly the same way. Subscribers see this for every competitor on every AI tool.
Example: Perplexity, dentist questions in this market
| Business | Named in | Rate | Range across passes |
|---|---|---|---|
| The market leader | 32 of 45 | 71% | 64 to 78% |
| Second practice | 26 of 45 | 58% | 50 to 65% |
| This practice | 23 of 45 | 51% | 44 to 58% |
| Median named practice | 6 of 45 | 13% | 8 to 18% |
The gap between this practice and the leader is not a mystery. It is a list of specific questions and sources, and the findings above name them.
Example recommendations
Every recommendation cites a specific artifact from the data, never “improve your online presence” with nothing behind it.
Observed in this scan
Competitor has an FAQ answering this exact question. 12 of 15 higher-ranked competitors have one. Publishing an FAQ covering it is a named, checkable action.
Supported by published research
AI tools cite review counts. Your top competitor shows 3 times your review volume. Prioritizing review collection this quarter is a research-grounded, not a guaranteed, move.